<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Balanced PC configuration : Cool util from Nvidia to find best CPU + GPU perf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.srikiran.net/blog/2008/06/18/balanced-pc-configuration-cool-util-from-nvidia-to-find-best-cpu-gpu-perf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.srikiran.net/blog/2008/06/18/balanced-pc-configuration-cool-util-from-nvidia-to-find-best-cpu-gpu-perf/</link>
	<description>Kiran Bulusu is an Field Applications Engineer with experience in the domain of Formal Verification, Logic Synthesis, DFT,Timing Closure, Floorplan and Place and Route, ,RTL-GDSII Design Methodology and Flow development,Pre-Sales and Post-Sales of the product. He is an evangelist and has expereince in technical marketing in EDA and Semiconductor industry. He is currently employed at Magma Design Automation.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kiran</title>
		<link>http://www.srikiran.net/blog/2008/06/18/balanced-pc-configuration-cool-util-from-nvidia-to-find-best-cpu-gpu-perf/#comment-12185</link>
		<dc:creator>kiran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.srikiran.net/blog/?p=42#comment-12185</guid>
		<description>sandeep,
your observation is right. I should have mentioned that I'm more interested in media rich apps as most content now a days fall into that category and there it performs better...

and BTW, yes power consumption BM would be interesting ..It should already be there , but might not be released to public I guess..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sandeep,<br />
your observation is right. I should have mentioned that I&#8217;m more interested in media rich apps as most content now a days fall into that category and there it performs better&#8230;</p>
<p>and BTW, yes power consumption BM would be interesting ..It should already be there , but might not be released to public I guess..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep</title>
		<link>http://www.srikiran.net/blog/2008/06/18/balanced-pc-configuration-cool-util-from-nvidia-to-find-best-cpu-gpu-perf/#comment-11302</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.srikiran.net/blog/?p=42#comment-11302</guid>
		<description>If you look carefully, you will see most of the big-number performance gains are in image processing + physics (games and/or photoshop).

However, in raw number crunching (PCMARK benchmark), you actually take a hit with the optimized PC. 

Personally, I think I would definitely like to see a power consumption benchmark.

Go green!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look carefully, you will see most of the big-number performance gains are in image processing + physics (games and/or photoshop).</p>
<p>However, in raw number crunching (PCMARK benchmark), you actually take a hit with the optimized PC. </p>
<p>Personally, I think I would definitely like to see a power consumption benchmark.</p>
<p>Go green!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<img src="http://www.srikiran.net/blog/wp-content/themes/blix/blix/images/authors/0.jpg" alt="" title="" />
